18.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=12865137&retmode=xml&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b490818.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=incoherent+motion&datetype=edat&usehistory=y&retmax=5&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908
To investigate whether humans achieve a high sensitivity to coherent motion by excluding the response to incoherent motion, we measured the magnetoencephalographic response to the motion of randomly located dots one half of which moved coherently while the other half moved incoherently. The response was related to the faster motion of either coherent or incoherent motion though the observers saw both. All the estimated response sources were within the extrastriate area. The results indicate that incoherent motion is represented in the neural activity of the human extrastriate area even when the coherent motion is perceived at the same time. The fact that the neural activity for the slower coherent motion is not represented in the magnetic response suggests the existence of interaction between the neural activities for the two motions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00617-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!