Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Mouse models of systemic and gastrointestinal infection with the yeast Candida albicans were used to investigate the ability of a commercial mannan antigen enzyme immunoassay and a commercial (1-->3) beta-D-glucan limulus assay to detect systemic infection and to differentiate between colonization and infection. Both assays were positive in all i.v. infected mice and negative in all uninfected control mice. In gastrointestinal infection both tests were positive whenever organ cultures were positive. In colonized mice with no detectable dissemination, there were mostly negative results with the glucan assay whereas the mannan assay was positive or intermediate in all colonized mice. Therefore, in the mouse model used, glucan detection appeared to be superior for differentiation between colonization and dissemination.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00038-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!