Renal injury is a common side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent ifosfamide. Current evidence suggests that the ifosfamide metabolite chloroacetaldehyde contributes to this nephrotoxicity. The present study examined the effects of chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein, another ifosfamide metabolite, on rabbit proximal renal tubule cells in primary culture. The ability of the uroprotectant medications sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine to prevent chloroacetaldehyde- and acrolein-induced renal cell injury was also assessed. Chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein (25-200 M) produced dose-dependent declines in neutral red dye uptake, glucose transport and glutathione content. Chloroacetaldehyde was a more potent toxin than acrolein. Pretreatment of cells with the glutathione-depleting agent buthionine sulfoximine enhanced the toxicity of both chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein while co-administration of mesna or amifostine prevented metabolite toxicity. These results support the hypothesis that chloroacetaldehyde is responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. The protective effect of mesna and amifostine in vitro contrasts with clinical experience showing that these medications do not eliminate ifosfamide nephrotoxicity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00044-4 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Metformin exhibits radiation countermeasures efficacy when used alone or in combination with sulfhydryl containing drugs.
Radiat Res
May 2014
Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Metformin, a biguanide drug used in the treatment of type II diabetes, was evaluated alone and in combination with amifostine, captopril, MESNA or N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) for its ability to protect when administered 24 h after irradiation. Mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF), human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) and SA-NH mouse sarcoma cells were exposed to 4 Gy in vitro. C3H mice were exposed to 7 Gy and evaluated utilizing an endogenous spleen colony assay system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSevere allergic reactions to thiol-based cytoprotective agents mesna and amifostine in a child with a supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol
August 2011
Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Both 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate sodium (mesna) and amifostine's active metabolite WR-1065 are thiol-based cytoprotective agents that are critical components of high-dose chemotherapy regimens used to treat various cancers in both adults and children. This case report describes a patient with a supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor who developed severe drug reactions to both mesna and amifostine/WR-1065, suggesting that the thiol component of these agents triggered the adverse reactions. This report highlights the clinical presentation of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in the context of pediatric oncology and the supportive care measures that, if implemented rapidly, may diminish the reaction severity and allow successful completion of chemotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To update a clinical practice guideline on the use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy protectants for patients with cancer.
Methods: An update committee reviewed literature published since the last guideline update in 2002.
Results: Thirty-nine reports met the inclusion criteria: palifermin and dexrazoxane, three reports (two studies) each; amifostine, 33 reports (31 studies); and mesna, no published randomized trials identified since 2002.
In vivo mesna and amifostine do not prevent chloroacetaldehyde nephrotoxicity in vitro.
Pediatr Nephrol
April 2008
INSERM U820, Métabolomique et Maladies Métaboliques, Faculté Laennec, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) is the putative metabolite responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. Whereas evidence suggests that sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine protect renal cells against CAA toxicity in vitro, their efficacy in clinical studies is controversial. To better understand the discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro results, we combined the in vivo intraperitoneal administration of either saline or mesna (100 mg/kg) or amifostine (200 mg/kg) in rats and the in vitro study of CAA toxicity to both proximal tubules and precision-cut renal cortical slices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDo antioxidants interfere with radiation therapy for cancer?
Integr Cancer Ther
September 2007
Cancer Communications, Lemont, Pennsylvania 16851, USA.
Despite recent comprehensive review articles concluding that supplemental antioxidants do not undermine the effectiveness of cytotoxic therapies, the use of antioxidants during cancer treatment remains controversial. Many oncologists take the position that antioxidants by their nature undermine the free radical mechanism of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and should therefore generally be avoided during treatment. For their part, many integrative practitioners believe that antioxidants taken during cancer treatment not only alleviate some of the adverse effects of that treatment but also enhance the efficacy of cancer therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!