OBJECTIVE: Previous studies demonstrated that the use of a custom-made intraoral acrylic appliance, known as a palatal stabilizing device, prevents palatal groove formation and reduces the frequency rate of accidental extubations in premature, intubated babies. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of a prefabricated palatal device with an acrylic custom-made palatal stabilizing device. Specifically, we compared the stability, fit, and retention of these two devices. DESIGN: Randomized comparative study. SETTING: Clincal trial. PATIENTS: A total of 70 medically stable, premature, intubated babies. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 70 medically stable, premature, intubated babies randomly received Pala-nate (experimental group, n = 34) or palatal stabilizing device (control group, n = 36). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Differences among birth weight, gestational age, and period of intubation of the two groups were statistically nonsignificant at p =.05. Although both appliances were effective in the prevention of palatal grooves, the Pala-nate was less retentive, thus requiring greater monitoring, and it was associated with a larger number of accidental extubations. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant at p =.05. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the custom-made, acrylic, palatal stabilizing device was more stable and more effective in the prevention of spontaneous extubations in premature orally intubated infants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00130478-200007000-00009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!