A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. | LitMetric

Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

Early Pregnancy and Gynaecology Assessment Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Published: June 2003

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the accuracy of diagnosing congenital uterine anomalies and measuring uterine cavity dimensions using 3D ultrasound by comparing evaluations from two independent observers.
  • Eighty-three 3D ultrasound volumes were analyzed, with findings showing a high level of agreement in diagnosing different types of uterine anomalies and good intraobserver reliability in measurement accuracy.
  • The results confirmed that 3D ultrasound is a reliable tool for both diagnosing these anomalies and accurately measuring uterine cavity dimensions.

Article Abstract

Objective: To examine the reproducibility of the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies and the repeatability of measurements of uterine cavity dimensions using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound.

Methods: The reproducibility of diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies was examined by re-slicing stored 3D ultrasound volumes. Each data set was evaluated by two independent observers. Assessment of uterine morphology was performed in a standardized plane, with the interstitial portions of the Fallopian tubes used as reference points. Additionally, in 35 cases of congenital uterine anomalies the width of the uterine cavity (W), fundal distortion (F) and the length of unaffected uterine cavity (C) were measured. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were evaluated by each observer performing all three measurements twice.

Results: Eighty-three 3D ultrasound volumes were examined. Both operators classified 27 uteri as normal, 33 as arcuate, 19 as subseptate and three as unicornuate. A single case of uterine anomaly was described as arcuate uterus by one operator and subseptate by another (kappa 0.97). The intraobserver variability for each of the three measurements (W, F and C) was satisfactory with limits of agreement ranging from +/-1.43 to +/-2.51 mm. The examination of the interobserver variability showed no significant differences between the two observers (F = 0.484, P > 0.05).

Conclusion: 3D ultrasound is a reproducible method for the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies and for the measurement of uterine cavity dimensions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.127DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

congenital uterine
20
uterine anomalies
20
diagnosis congenital
16
uterine cavity
16
uterine
11
reproducibility diagnosis
8
cavity dimensions
8
ultrasound volumes
8
three measurements
8
congenital
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!