Background: There is, nominally at least, a universal health visiting service in Great Britain, although the frequency of contacts may be severely restricted. Debates about whether home visiting should be universal or selective, therefore, focus on whether health visitors should use professional judgement or structured assessment tools to target attention within their caseload. Research attention has focused mainly on unstructured needs assessments and professional judgment or the development of assessment tools, so that the views of practitioners using structured instruments and their clients are not known.
Methods: A two-phase qualitative study examined the acceptability and effectiveness of a structured health needs assessment tool (HNAT) implemented in London. Views about the tool were elicited from 30 health visitors through telephone interview, and then 21 assessments were observed and tape-recorded; 19 clients were interviewed after the event. Data were evaluated for adequate coverage of views across the target population and analysed using the framework approach.
Findings: A range of views were expressed, but the HNAT caused anxiety and distress to, particularly, the most vulnerable clients. The structured format of the tool appeared to encourage the health visitors to question instead of listen. It did not help to identify all the needs and intruded into normal practice in an insensitive and unhelpful way.
Limitations: This study investigated only one form of structured HNAT. These are commonly used to prioritize undifferentiated needs of clients who have been offered an unsolicited, health promoting service. Our findings therefore do not apply to validated instruments used for screening or specific diagnostic purposes where a client has requested help with a problem.
Conclusions: Given the problems in use and potential for harm, this form of structured assessment tool appears unsuitable for routine use to determine the intensity of health visiting contacts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02675.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Background: Dental caries is one of the most common non-communicable diseases in humans. Various interventions are available for the management, of which microinvasive techniques such as infiltration, sealants, glass ionomers, are novel and convenient. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare microinvasive techniques with noninvasive or invasive treatment modalities in terms of effectiveness in halting interproximal caries lesion progression radiographically assessed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerceived wildfire risk and past experiences with wildfire smoke influence public support for prescribed burning in the western conterminous United States.
BMC Public Health
January 2025
Heluna Health, City of Industry, City of Industry, CA, USA.
Background: Prescribed burning is an important fuel management tool to prevent severe wildfires. There is a pressing need to increase its application to reduce dry fuels in the western United States, a region that has experienced many damaging wildfires. Public support for this practice is tempered by concern around smoke impacts and escape risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrevalence of metabolic syndrome and its components in Iran: an updated meta-analysis.
BMC Endocr Disord
January 2025
Social Determinants of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Background: Considering, the changes in lifestyle during the last decade the main aim of this study was to investigate the pooled prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components in Iran.
Methods: For implementing a comprehensive search strategy related to the objectives of the present meta-analysis, all international databases like PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Embase, Web of Sciences (Elsevier), and CINHAL were searched up to January 2024. The quality of the final selected studies was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal (JBI) tool for analytical cross-sectional studies.
Iatrogenic intramural esophageal hematoma during EUS-B-FNA procedure.
BMC Pulm Med
January 2025
Unidade de Broncologia e Pneumologia de Intervenção - Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Coimbra, Portugal.
Background: Esophageal ultrasound with bronchoscope fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, complementing endobronchial lung ultrasound (EBUS). While generally considered safe, there is a notable lack of comprehensive knowledge within the interventional pulmonology community regarding potential complications.
Case Presentation: We present a case involving a 66-year-old male with squamous cell lung carcinoma undergoing mediastinal staging.
Development and validation of a five-year cardiovascular risk assessment tool for Asian adults aged 75 years and older.
BMC Geriatr
January 2025
Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 33, Linsen S. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei, 100025, Taiwan.
Background: To identify cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in Asian elderly aged 75 years and older and subsequently develop and validate a sex-specific five-year CV risk assessment tool for this population.
Methods: This study included 12,174 patients aged ≥ 75 years without a prior history of cardiovascular disease at a single hospital in Taiwan. Electronic health records were linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database and the National Death Registry to ensure comprehensive health information.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!