Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The push to rapidly implement the wraparound approach for families of children with serious emotional disturbance (SED) has resulted in a number of service models that may or may not be in accordance with its theoretical foundation. Given the number of wraparound programs being implemented nationwide, the need to develop instruments that can measure the fidelity of wraparound services in a reliable manner should not be ignored. The purpose of this study was to examine the interobserver agreement of the Wraparound Observation Form--Second Version (WOF-2), an observation system designed to assess the fidelity of wraparound services. Observations were conducted across 30 family planning meetings where wraparound services were provided. The mean percentage agreement across the 48 items was 96.7% (range 83.3-100%) and the average kappa statistic was 0.886 (range = 0.318-1.0). On the basis of these results, the WOF-2 appears to be a reliable instrument for assessing the delivery of wraparound services.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1023229411114 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!