Non-responders to egg grown influenza vaccine seroconvert after booster immunization with MDCK cell grown vaccine.

Vaccine

Department of Medical Microbiology and Retroscreen Virology, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, St Bart's and the London, 327 Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.

Published: June 2003

We have investigated whether 'at risk' subjects who did not respond serologically during a pre-study vaccination with a commercial egg grown influenza sub-unit vaccine would respond to a subsequent vaccination with either a single dose of MDCK cell grown influenza vaccine or a standard egg grown influenza vaccine containing the same virus strains. We studied 48 non-responder subjects with a mean age 67.5, range: 34-82 years. In this non-responder group the increased immune response that was detected after boosting with an MDCK cell derived vaccine response was variable and relatively modest, except for the A/Texas strain in the vaccine. The proportion of subjects, with an HI titre of >/=40 (protective antibody titre) increased from 50 to 83% (A/Texas strain), from 13 to 25% (B/Harbin strain) and from 38 to 46% (A/Wuhan strain). In comparison a booster vaccination with egg-derived influenza vaccine resulted in an increase immune response with an HI antibody titre >/=40 for two of the three strains, namely from 17 to 58% for the B/Harbin strain and from 8 to 33% for the A/Wuhan strain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00214-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

grown influenza
16
influenza vaccine
16
egg grown
12
mdck cell
12
vaccine
8
cell grown
8
immune response
8
a/texas strain
8
titre >/=40
8
antibody titre
8

Similar Publications

The seasonal influenza vaccine contains strains of viruses from distinct subtypes that are grown independently and then combined. However, most individuals exhibit a more robust response to one of these strains and thus are vulnerable to infection by others. By studying a monozygotic twin cohort, we found that although prior exposure is a factor, host genetics are a stronger driver of subtype bias to influenza viral strains.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Epidemiological studies show that factors like pre-vaccination immune status, age, gender, and vaccination history affect how people respond to influenza vaccines, but results vary across different studies.* -
  • A new Bayesian model was created to analyze the relationships between these host factors and antibody responses after vaccination, revealing that pre-vaccination antibody levels and vaccination history significantly affect post-vaccine antibody dynamics.* -
  • The findings suggest that individuals who have been vaccinated less frequently and have lower pre-vaccination antibody levels experience longer durations of effective protection (seroprotection) from the vaccine, with notable differences observed in antibody response to different influenza subtypes.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Swine influenza A viruses (IAVsw) are important causes of disease in pigs but also constitute a public health risk. IAVsw strains show remarkable differences in pathogenicity. We aimed to generate airway organoids from the porcine lower respiratory tract and use these to establish well-differentiated airway epithelial cell (WD-AEC) cultures grown at an air-liquid interface (ALI) for in vitro screening of IAVsw strain virulence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) and endemic coronaviruses (eCoVs) are common etiologic agents for seasonal respiratory infections. The human H1N1 of IAV and coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43) can result in hospitalization, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and even death, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. They infect the epithelium of the respiratory tract by interacting with host cell sialic acid (Sia)- linked receptors whose synthesis is catalyzed by sialyltransferases (STs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immunogenicity studies suggest that recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) may provide better protection against influenza than standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (SD IIV). This randomized trial evaluated the relative vaccine effectiveness (VE) and immunogenicity of RIV versus SD IIV in frontline workers and students aged 18-64 years.

Methods: Participants were randomized to receive RIV or SD IIV and followed for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza during the 2022-2023 influenza season.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!