Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Patients with severe pulmonary emphysema have a greatly increased oxygen cost of breathing (O(2) cost), and this is the cause of serious malnutrition, or respiratory cachexia, in such patients.
Study Objectives: To clarify the effect of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on respiratory function and the nutritional state of these patients through a reduction in the O(2) cost of the respiratory muscles.
Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting, patients, and interventions: Twenty-three patients who underwent LVRS in Tohoku University Hospital.
Measurements: Pulmonary function and O(2) cost were measured perioperatively by utilizing a method of continuous dead space. In addition, we calculated the proportion of oxygen consumption (O(2)) of respiratory muscles to total O(2) (%O(2)resp) from the measured energy expenditure and the predicted values.
Results: FEV(1) and arterial oxygen pressure increased after surgery while lung volume and dyspnea decreased (p < 0.01), and O(2) cost was also reduced from 0.044 to 0.026 log(mL/min)/(L/min) [p < 0.001]. Moreover, the change in O(2) cost had a strong negative correlation with that of FEV(1) (r = - 0.70, p < 0.001), and a moderate positive correlation with that of the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). %O(2)resp was 23.1% at rest and 55.5% at maximal ventilation. LVRS reduced %O(2)resp at maximal ventilation to 49.0% (p < 0.05), but %O(2)resp at rest did not decrease after surgery.
Conclusions: LVRS reduces energy expenditure of respiratory muscles especially during exercise by decreasing small airway obstruction and hyperinflated lung volume. This may reverse the malnourished state in end-stage emphysema.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.6.1847 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!