Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: The final examination in paediatrics for medical undergraduates in Sri Lanka consists of a written and a clinical component. Each candidate at the clinical component sees one long case and two short cases.
Objectives: To assess the views of the bystanders regarding their sick children participating at a clinical examination, and to evaluate the children's perceptions of the clinical component.
Methods: An interviewer-administered questionnaire was discussed separately with the participating children and their bystanders at the final year examination in paediatrics of the Faculty of Medicine, Colombo, in 1999.
Results: 116 patients participated at the clinical examination in paediatrics. 107 (92%) of the bystanders were the children's mothers. Informed consent had not been obtained for use in the examination from 59 (51%) of the children's mothers. Seven (6%) were not satisfied with the way their children were handled by the candidates, and 25 (21.5%) showed concern about the number of candidates examining their child. Bystanders who participated at the long cases were inconvenience more than those in the short cases. 34 children above the age of 5 years were also interviewed. An explanation regarding the examination had not been given to 31 (92%) of them. Six children (17%) said they were examined for too long. A majority of the bystanders welcomed the payments received and all of them were satisfied with the medical students' conduct and politeness. All of them agreed that this form of clinical examination was a good method of evaluating a student's professional competence.
Conclusions: Several aspects of the clinical component of the final examination in paediatrics for medical undergraduates need to be improved to minimise the inconvenience experienced by the children and their parents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v48i1.3387 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!