The poorly written administration and scoring instructions for the Boston Naming Test allow too wide a range of interpretations. Three different, seemingly correct interpretations of the scoring methods were compared. The results show that these methods can produce large differences in the total score.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2003.92.2.468 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!