The optimal conditions for recovery of an enzyme were determined using gas/liquid two-phase flows. When filtering the enzyme-only solution under single-phase flow conditions, severe fouling occurred. This fouling was manifest as a decline in flux to less than 2% of the initial water flux and a decline in protein concentration in the permeate to 30% of its initial value, during a five-hour filtration period. When yeast cells were added under the same experimental conditions, enzyme transmission was maintained at 100% for the five-hour period and the enzyme mass flux was twofold higher. During gas-sparged microfiltration of the enzyme/yeast mixture in a permeate-recycling mode at the same liquid flow rate, gas/liquid slug flow strongly decreased the transmission of the enzyme (70% decrease), even though the permeate flux was improved (140% improvement). As a result, the mass flux of the enzyme was significantly reduced. However, with a bubble flow pattern, the permeate flux was 1.5 times higher and the transmission was maintained at a high level. The enzyme mass flux was then 25% higher when compared to single-phase flow filtration conditions. During diafiltration experiments with a bubble flow pattern, a 13% higher enzyme recovery was achieved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb06021.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mass flux
12
enzyme
8
enzyme transmission
8
gas/liquid two-phase
8
two-phase flows
8
single-phase flow
8
transmission maintained
8
enzyme mass
8
permeate flux
8
bubble flow
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!