BACKGROUND: A published audit of the management of colorectal cancer at a general hospital in the 1970s was available for comparison with a later audit at the same hospital in the 1990s. METHODS: Case note analysis. RESULTS: In the later audit, more cases were treated annually by an unchanged surgical team. The incidence of synchronous combined excision of the rectum, for rectal cancers suitable for resection, was halved, and that of anterior resection of the rectum (sphincter sparing, without a permanent stoma) increased almost threefold. The incidence of local recurrence in cases suitable for rectal surgery dropped from 17% to 9%, in spite of the change in the principal operation undertaken for this population. Outcomes associated with critical care improved as resources in this discipline became available. Overall survival figures were only improved by 6% in the20-year period, reflecting a diagnosis of Dukes C tumours or worse in at least 45% of the stable population studied in both audits. CONCLUSION: More resources are necessary in Great Britain to increase survival figures in this common cancer. Earlier diagnosis and more specialist management of the disease may allow us to emulate American and Swedish survival figures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00368.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!