A survey of Phase I dose escalation trials published since 1995 shows that there is great disparity in all aspects of the design of the studies, and the cohort sizes range from 2 to 16 subjects with a great variety in the distribution between active and placebo-treated subjects. This study investigates the impact of the cohort size on Type I error and power in Phase I dose escalation trials based on laboratory data, with the hospitalization-induced increase in hepatic enzyme levels taken into consideration. The power of a Phase I dose escalation trial is very low, and only events with a very high probability of occurrence are detectable with acceptable power. For studies with cohort sizes smaller than 6 active subjects, there is much to gain with the inclusion of 1 extra subject, but for more than 10 subjects, little is gained by increasing the cohort size. With increasing cohort sizes, the probability of spontaneous non-drug-related events also increases, and this background rate needs to be considered when evaluating the trial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0091270003252243DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phase dose
16
dose escalation
16
cohort size
12
escalation trials
12
cohort sizes
12
trials based
8
based laboratory
8
laboratory data
8
studies cohort
8
power phase
8

Similar Publications

BI 1703880, a novel STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING) agonist, has demonstrated preclinical antitumor activity. As STING activation can upregulate programmed death ligand 1 and human leukocyte antigen in tumor cells, a combination of BI 1703880 and an anti-programmed cell death protein 1-antibody, such as ezabenlimab, may improve efficacy. This first-in-human phase Ia study (NCT05471856) is evaluating BI 1703880 plus ezabenlimab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dordaviprone (ONC201) is a novel, small molecule imipridone with antitumor effects in glioma patients. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of dordaviprone following single escalating doses (Part A), as a capsule content mixed with applesauce or Gatorade (sports drink) [Part B1]), and with or without food [Part B2]. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events pooled across study parts (Parts A, B1, and B2) were headache, dizziness, and headache, respectively; all were mild.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy and safety of daprodustat in patients on peritoneal dialysis in the ASCEND-D trial.

Nephrol Dial Transplant

November 2024

Department of Medicine and Nephrology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.

Background And Hypothesis: Daprodustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is approved for treatment of anemia in dialysis patients with CKD in some parts of the world. This subgroup analysis examined the efficacy and safety of daprodustat versus darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia of CKD undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Methods: ASCEND-D (NCT02879305) was an open-label, Phase 3 trial; patients with CKD were randomized to daprodustat daily and epoetin alfa (HD patients) or darbepoetin alfa (PD patients).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This was the first phase 1 study conducted in the United States. It consisted of dose-escalation (part A) and multiple indication-specific cohort expansion (part B), investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy of toripalimab (anti-programmed cell death-1 inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies.

Methods: Patients with advanced malignancies that progressed after treatment with at least one prior line of standard systemic therapy, including the patients with advanced/recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), received toripalimab 240 mg every 3 weeks in part B.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Uveal melanoma remains a disease with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis despite advances in clinical management. Because monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to limited improvement in response rates, combination with other agents that act on the biological basis of oncogenesis has been proposed as a possible therapeutic strategy.

Methods: We designed a phase 1b trial to test the safety and tolerability of selinexor in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced uveal melanoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!