Objective: Current guidelines advocate adding a long acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid as an alternative to increasing the dose of the latter. Since it is unclear how this translates into effects on surrogate inflammatory markers, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory activity of fluticasone plus salmeterol in combination versus twice the dose of fluticasone alone.
Methods: Fifteen mild-to-moderate asthmatics (mean FEV(1) 80% predicted) uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroids (mean dose 470 microg) were randomised in a single-blind crossover fashion to receive 2 weeks each of fluticasone 250 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg in combination (FP+SM), 1 puff b.i.d., and fluticasone 500 microg (FP), 1 puff b.i.d. Prior to each randomised treatment, there was a 2-week run-in and washout period during which patients used their usual inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Measurements were made before and after randomised treatment periods. The primary outcome was airway hyper-responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate (AMP PC(20)), while secondary endpoints were exhaled tidal nitric oxide (NO), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced mid-expiratory flow (FEF(25-75)).
Results: For AMP PC(20), FP alone but not FP+SM conferred a significant ( P<0.05) improvement amounting to 3.27 (95% CI 1.46-7.32) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.64-3.23) geometric mean fold shifts, respectively, from baseline, while the difference between treatments was significantly ( P<0.05) greater with FP alone: a 2.26-fold (95% CI 1.01-5.07) difference. Both FP alone and FP+SM conferred significant ( P<0.05) falls in NO from baseline: 2.33 (95% CI 1.71-3.19) and 1.49 (95% CI 1.09-2.03) geometric mean fold changes, respectively, while between treatments the reduction was significantly ( P<0.05) greater with FP alone: a 1.57-fold (95% CI 1.15-2.14) difference. Neither treatment significantly improved FEV(1) or FEF(25-75).
Conclusion: Double the dose of FP alone relative to FP+SM conferred superior effects on surrogate inflammatory markers but not on lung function. Long-term studies are required to evaluate whether these improvements on surrogate inflammatory markers translate into commensurate reductions in airway remodelling and exacerbations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-003-0571-9 | DOI Listing |
Respir Res
January 2025
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Background: Choosing effective devices (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]-long-acting β2 agonist [LABA] combination inhalers) as maintenance treatment is critical for managing patients with asthma. We aimed to compare ICS/LABA combination efficacy, safety, and adherence across inhaler types and components in patients newly diagnosed with asthma.
Methods: Utilizing South Korea's National Health Insurance Service data, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving patients aged 18-80 years, newly diagnosed with asthma who received ICS/LABA combination therapy between January 2016 and December 2020.
Respir Med
January 2025
Pulmonology Center of the Reformed Church, Munkácsy M. U.70, 2045, Törökbálint, Hungary.
The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of breathing parameters, age, gender and disease status on the lung doses of the two ICS + LABA fixed combination dry powder drugs. Breathing parameters of 113 COPD patients were measured while inhaling through emptied NEXThaler® and Ellipta® inhalers and the corresponding lung doses were calculated. Lung dose of Foster® NEXThaler® was superior to the lung dose of Relvar® Ellipta® in around 85 % of the patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pulm Med
December 2024
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China.
Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.
Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!