During the last three decades, Brazilians have relied almost exclusively on two contraceptive methods, the pill and female sterilization, with sterilization use increasing over time. Until a new law was passed in 1997, sterilization was virtually illegal and not covered by either public or private health insurance. It was, however, frequently provided in public and private hospitals in conjunction with a cesarean section. The new law regulating sterilization provided for reimbursement for interval sterilizations by public health insurance, but placed restrictions on availability intended to reduce the use of cesareans. These restrictions included the prohibition of postpartum sterilizations. This paper focuses on women's sterilization intentions during pregnancy and their experiences postpartum. In a prospective study of 1612 pregnant women carried out in four Brazilian cities, there was substantial demand for postpartum sterilization in both the private and public sectors among women who wanted no more children. However, public patients were much less likely to be sterilized than private patients. Thus, the new law may not have reduced inequities in access or, paradoxically, the incentive for unnecessary cesarean sections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00039-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

demand postpartum
8
female sterilization
8
public private
8
health insurance
8
sterilization
7
public
5
frustrated demand
4
postpartum
4
postpartum female
4
sterilization brazil
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!