Several studies have pointed out ethical shortcomings in the decision-making process for withholding or withdrawing life-supporting treatments. We conducted a study to evaluate the perceptions of all caregivers involved in this process in the intensive care unit. A closed-ended questionnaire was completed by 3,156 nursing staff members and 521 physicians from 133 French intensive care units (participation rate, 42%). Decision-making processes were perceived as satisfactory by 73% of physicians and by only 33% of the nursing staff. More than 90% of caregivers believed that decision-making should be collaborative, but 50% of physicians and only 27% of nursing staff members believed that the nursing staff was actually involved (p < 0.001). Fear of litigation was a reason given by physicians for modifying information given to competent patients, families, and nursing staff. Perceptions by nursing staff may be a reliable indicator of the quality of medical decision-making processes and may serve as a simple and effective tool for evaluating everyday practice. Recommendations and legislation may help to build consensus and avoid conflicts among caregivers at each step of the decision-making process.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200207-752OC | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
"It's a delicate balance": clinicians' experiences of providing heroin-assisted treatment.
Harm Reduct J
December 2024
Unit for Clinical Research on Addictions, Oslo University Hospital Health Trust, PB 4959 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway.
Background: Little attention has been paid to the experiences of clinicians and health personnel who provide heroin-assisted treatment (HAT). This study provides the first empirical findings about the clinicians' experiences of providing HAT in the Norwegian context.
Methods: 23 qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 clinicians shortly after HAT clinics opened in Norway's two largest cities: Oslo and Bergen.
Patient- and Family-Centered Outcomes After Intensive Care Unit Admission.
Am J Crit Care
January 2025
Eliotte L. Hirshberg is an assistant professor of pediatrics, Shock Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health, Murray, Utah; Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Background: Family satisfaction with intensive care is a measure of patient experience and patient-centered care. Among the factors that might influence family satisfaction are the timing of patient admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU), the ICU environment, and individual health care providers.
Objective: To evaluate family satisfaction with the ICU and to explore associations between satisfaction and specific characteristics of the ICU stay.
Background: For patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone microvascular free flap surgery, securing a tracheostomy collar onto the neck using the traditional method (ie, with tracheostomy ties) is contraindicated because the ties may compress the newly vascularized tissue. However, no clear guidance exists for the use of other methods in these patients. Current techniques often use safety pins, which can cause injury to staff members.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFrom Moral Distress to Moral Integrity: Qualitative Evaluation of a New Moral Conflict Assessment Tool.
Am J Crit Care
January 2025
Peter Dodek is a professor emeritus, Division of Critical Care Medicine and Center for Advancing Health Outcomes, St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Background: Moral distress affects the well-being of health care professionals and can lead to burnout and attrition. Assessing moral distress and taking action based on this assessment are important. A new moral conflict assessment (MCA) designed to prompt action was developed and tested.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFManagement of operating theatre ambient temperature for major burn patients in a state-wide adult burns centre.
Burns
December 2024
Victorian Adults Burns Service, The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd., Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia. Electronic address:
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of limiting increases in theatre ambient temperature to 27°C to prevent intraoperative patient hypothermia.
Methods: This single-centre, comparative cohort clinical study investigated the management of theatre ambient temperatures involving patients with ≥ 20 % TBSA burn injuries at Victorian Adult Burns Service (Melbourne, Australia). Data from the intervention group (August 2021 - February 2023, theatre ambient temperature increase limited to 27°C) was compared with a historical cohort (August 2019 - August 2021).
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!