Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study assessed the effect of urban supplemental measles vaccination campaigns (1997-1999) in Mozambique that targeted children aged 9-59 months. Reported measles cases were analyzed to the end of 2001 to determine campaign impact. Hospital inpatient data were collected in the national capital and in three provincial capitals where epidemics occurred the year after the campaigns. Measles epidemics followed campaigns in the capital city, in 4 of 9 provincial capitals, and in 39 of 126 districts. Reasons for limited campaign impact included a low proportion of urban dwellers, the geographic location of some provincial capitals, the limited target age group, and low routine and campaign coverage. Routine immunization and disease surveillance should be strengthened and campaigns must achieve >90% coverage and target wider age groups and geographic areas in order to reach a high proportion of persons susceptible to measles.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/368058 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!