Stability of longitudinal motor development in very low birthweight infants from 5 months to 5.5 years.

Acta Paediatr

Department of Child Neurology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Published: July 2003

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study assessed the motor performance of 165 very low birthweight (VLBW) infants at various ages, aiming to understand the stability of their motor development in relation to factors like birthweight, gestational age, and certain medical conditions.
  • - Results showed that 53% of VLBW infants had stable motor development, while significant contributors to variability included periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) and birthweight; 47% displayed unstable motor development, largely unrelated to risk factors.
  • - While most VLBW children performed within the normal range by age 5.5 years, their motor skills were still inferior compared to children born at term, indicating a need for ongoing monitoring or

Article Abstract

Aim: The motor performance of 165 very low birthweight (VLBW) infants was assessed prospectively at 5, 10, 18 mo and 5.5 y. The aim of the study was to evaluate longitudinal stability of motor development and its association with birthweight (BW), gestational age at birth, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leucomalacia (PVL) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Furthermore, at 5.5 y the motor behaviour of the VLBW population was compared with that of 124 children born at term.

Methods: The results of each examination were ranked into four levels and the stability of motor development was evaluated on the basis of this ranking. At 5.5 y, VLBW children and controls were compared according to percentiles in the Movement ABC.

Results: Fifty-three percent of the VLBW infants displayed a stable motor development. Only PVL and BW contributed significantly to the variability in their motor performance. Forty-seven percent of the infants exhibited an unstable motor development with no association to risk factors. In the entire group only IVH and severe ROP were related to poor motor performance. The majority of the VLBW children performed within the normal range at 5.5 y but their performances were inferior to those of control children.

Conclusion: VLBW infants with poor early motor performance and/or severe IVH/PVL and ROP should be recruited into individualized follow-up programmes, whereas regular ongoing monitoring by follow-up may be sufficient for those with normal early motor performance and normal ultrasound findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00526.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motor development
20
motor performance
20
vlbw infants
12
motor
11
low birthweight
8
stability motor
8
development association
8
vlbw children
8
early motor
8
vlbw
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!