A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to enhance physician compliance with diabetes foot examinations by implementing an educational intervention.
  • Analyzing results showed a significant increase in the number of proper foot examinations conducted and documented, with improvements across all assessment components (circulatory, skin, neurological).
  • The findings suggest that simple educational strategies can effectively promote adherence to essential care guidelines for diabetic patients, reducing the risk of complications like amputations.

Article Abstract

Background: The established guidelines for a diabetes foot examination include assessing circulatory, skin, and neurological status to detect problems early and reduce the likelihood of amputation. Physician adherence to the guidelines for proper examination is less than optimal.

Objective: Our objective was to increase compliance with the performance of a proper foot examination through a predominantly physician-directed interventional campaign.

Methods: The study consisted of 3 parts: a retrospective chart review to estimate background compliance, an educational intervention, and prospective chart review at 3 and 6 months. A properly documented foot examination was defined as assessing at least 2 of the 3 necessary components. The educational intervention consisted of 2 lectures directed at resident physicians and a quality assurance announcement at a general internal medicine staff meeting. Clinic support staff were instructed to remove the shoes and socks of all diabetic patients when they were placed in exam rooms, and signs reminding diabetics were placed in each exam room.

Results: There was a significant increase in the performance of proper foot examination over the course of the study (baseline 14.0%, 3 months 58.0%, 6 months 62.1%; P <.001). Documentation of any component of a proper foot examination also increased substantially (32.6%, 67.3%, 72.5%; P <.001). Additionally, performance of each component of a proper exam increased dramatically during the study: neurological (13.5%, 35.8%, 38.5%; P <.001), skin (23.0%, 64.2%, 69.2%; P <.001), and vascular (14.0%, 51.2%, 50.5%; P <.001).

Conclusions: Patients with diabetes are unlikely to have foot examinations in their primary medical care. A simple, low-cost educational intervention significantly improved the adherence to foot examination guidelines for patients with diabetes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1494848PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10662.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foot examination
16
performance proper
12
proper foot
8
chart review
8
educational intervention
8
foot
5
examination
5
physician-directed educational
4
educational campaign
4
campaign performance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!