Objective: Patients with large prostate volumes undergoing interstitial brachytherapy (BT) are currently believed to have worse urinary symptoms and quality of life (QOL) following the implant. We sought to determine if data from patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT at our institution supported this notion using a cross-sectional study design.
Methods: From 14 March 1997 to 25 August 2000, 248 patients underwent neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT monotherapy (BTM) or BT combined with external beam (BTC) for treatment of localized prostate cancer. FACT-G and AUASS questionnaires were mailed to all patients on 1 September 2001. Overall FACT-G scores along with the irritative (IAUA) and obstructive (OAUA) subscales of the AUASS were calculated for each patient. Prostate volume (one to two weeks prior to BT), number of seeds, and implant method (ultrasound or CT guided) were compared with the outcomes on the two validated instruments. All analyses were adjusted for time since procedure and patient age.
Results: 169 of 248 (68%) patients returned questionnaires. The median prostate volume was 37cc and number of seeds implanted was 95. Our data shows little correlation between total FACT-G or AUASS scores and volume of the prostate. Likewise, neither FACT-G nor IAUA scores appeared related to the number of seeds implanted. A correlation was seen when comparing number of seeds with OAUA scores, but this result appeared to be driven by the BTC group. Number of needles implanted did not appear to be related to total FACT-G scores. The number of needles inserted was related to both IAUA and OAUA scores in the BTC group, but not in BTM group.
Conclusion: Quality of life and urinary function scores do not appear to be strongly related to pre-implant prostate volume or method of implantation and thus patients should not be dissuaded from considering neoadjuvant androgen ablation followed by BT solely due to prostate size.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00134-9 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA.
Lung cancer is the third most prevalent cancer, following breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men. However, it remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. As treatment options have advanced, the significance of accurate diagnosis has increased, enabling targeted and more personalized therapeutic treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
January 2025
Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Introduction: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and urinary toxicity of LDR-brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.
Materials And Methods: 235 primary prostate cancer patients treated with LDR-brachytherapy and subsequently followed up in our center were included in this study. Biochemical relapse free survival (bRFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated.
Indian J Urol
January 2025
Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) is emerging as an alternative to radical treatment for prostate cancer (CaP). The purpose of this study is to assess the current perceptions of FT amongst urologists.
Methods: A 22-item questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the American Urological Association.
Indian J Urol
January 2025
Uro-Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Introduction: Recently, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System - 3 lesions (PI-RADS 3) have been sub classified into "3a" - lesions with a volume of <0.5 mL and "3b" - lesions exceeding 0.5 mL, whereas the prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is an established adjunct tool for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Biomed Opt
January 2025
Lund University, Department of Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Significance: The spatial distribution of the photosensitizing drug concentration is an important parameter for predicting the photodynamic therapy (PDT) outcome. Current diffuse fluorescence tomography methods lack accuracy in quantifying drug concentration. The development of accurate methods for monitoring the temporal evolution of the drug distribution in tissue can advance the real-time light dosimetry in PDT of tumors, leading to better treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!