Fluoroscopy (FS)- or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided heartworm removal was carried out using flexible alligator forceps to compare the rate of worm removal. As a result, the worm removal rates were similar between the two procedures. However, the TEE-guided procedure does not involve radiation exposure, and facilitates observation of worms in the cardiac chamber and pulmonary artery. Therefore, the TEE-guided procedure is thought to be more useful than the FS-guided procedure in clinical setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.65.259DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heartworm removal
8
removal rates
8
flexible alligator
8
alligator forceps
8
transesophageal echocardiography
8
worm removal
8
tee-guided procedure
8
comparison canine
4
canine heartworm
4
removal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!