Objectives: To evaluate the long-term results of cold-knife incision (CNI) of nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomosis strictures (UASs) after urinary diversion in a consecutive series of patients.
Methods: Since 1994, we have evaluated retrospectively 40 patients with 43 UASs, who were primarily treated with CNI (group 1). Six patients from group 1 with 7 UASs who failed primary CNI comprised group 2. After placement of an 8F nephrostomy tube, a 0.035-inch guidewire bypassed the stricture in an antegrade fashion under guidance of a centrally opened ureteral catheter (5F). A wire-mounted cold-knife was pulled through the strictured area in retrograde fashion under fluoroscopic control. Postoperatively, an 8 to 12F stent was left indwelling for 6 to 12 weeks. Successful treatment was defined as radiographic and scintigraphic resolution of obstruction and symptomatic relief.
Results: In group 1, after removal of the stent, the ureteroenteric area remained patent in 26 (60.5%) of 43 UASs during a follow-up period of 38.8 months (range 12 to 85). The success rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 67.8%, and 60.5%, respectively. In group 2, no success occurred. The diameter and length of the stricture, kidney function, hydronephrosis grade, presence of urinary infection at presentation, past CNI or radiotherapy, number of incisions with the cold-knife, and premature appearance of the anastomosis stricture were statistically significant influences on the outcome (P <0.05). Considering only the patients (n = 8) with the most favorable predictive factors (interval to stricture formation 12 months or longer, stricture length 1.5 cm or less, and hydronephrosis grade I-II), the success rate was 100%. No complications were observed.
Conclusions: CNI is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for primary UASs, providing durable results compared with other modalities used for endoureterotomy, and should be considered as an initial approach. The selection of patients with the most favorable prognostic factors leads to excellent results. As a secondary procedure, CNI was not successful.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02503-7 | DOI Listing |
BMC Urol
August 2017
Department of Urology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, No. 168 Litang Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102218, China.
Background: The ureterointestinal anastomosis stricture (UAS) is a common complication of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. For decades, open anastomotic revision remained the gold standard for the treatment of UAS. However, with the advancement in endoscopic technology, mini-invasive therapeutic approaches have been used in its management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrology
December 2010
Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Endourological modalities are considered the first line of treatment for benign ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures except in long strictures, completely obliterated lumen, prior radiation, and poor renal function. Endoureterotomy provided better success than balloon dilatation. In poor-operative risk patients, metal or double-J stents are viable options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Urol
November 2005
Department of Urology, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Purpose: We describe a new surgical endoscopic technique for nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures. This procedure involving endoureterotomy by intraluminal invagination (the Lovaco technique) is performed by adopting a combined percutaneous antegrade and endoscopic retrograde approach. The results obtained by this technique are reviewed with long-term followup.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrology
March 2003
Department of Urology, Krankenhaus Nordwest Teaching Hospital of Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Objectives: To evaluate the long-term results of cold-knife incision (CNI) of nonmalignant ureterointestinal anastomosis strictures (UASs) after urinary diversion in a consecutive series of patients.
Methods: Since 1994, we have evaluated retrospectively 40 patients with 43 UASs, who were primarily treated with CNI (group 1). Six patients from group 1 with 7 UASs who failed primary CNI comprised group 2.
Eur Urol
March 2001
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Nordwest Hospital, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, D-60488 Frankfurt, Germany.
Objective: We report our experience on antegrade percutaneous incision of ureterointestinal anastomosis strictures after urinary diversion.
Materials And Methods: Since 1994, we have evaluated retrospectively 18 patients with 22 ureterointestinal anastomosis strictures (UAS), who were treated with cold-knife incision. After placement of an 8-french nephrostomy tube, a 0.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!