Comparison of neonatal effects of epidural and general anesthesia for cesarean section.

Gynecol Obstet Invest

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuzmayis Universit, and University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Published: July 2003

We assessed the influence of anesthetic technique for cesarean section on neonatal outcome. Thirty parturient women (ASA I/II) were randomly allocated into two groups. In Group GA general anesthesia was induced with 4 mg.kg(-1) thiopental and 1.5 mg.kg(-1) succinylcholine. In group EA epidural anesthesia was performed with 20 ml 0.375% bupivacaine through L(3-4) inter-space. 1-min Apgar scores were significantly higher in group EA (p < 0.001). Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity scores at 2 and 24 h were higher in group EA (p < 0.001). In terms of blood gas values, umbilical arterial pH and pO(2) values were higher in group EA (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The first breast-feeding intervals were found to be shorter in group EA (p < 0.001). We conclude that in terms of better Apgar and NAC scores, acid-base status and earlier initiation of breast-feeding, the epidural anesthesia may be preferred to general anesthesia in cesarean section.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000068956DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general anesthesia
12
higher group
12
group 0001
12
anesthesia cesarean
8
epidural anesthesia
8
scores higher
8
group
6
anesthesia
5
comparison neonatal
4
neonatal effects
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!