Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
To clarify the factors contributing to patient satisfaction with facial movement after the classic hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis, we examined 46 such patients who consented to an interview and video-recording. No correlation was seen between the physician's evaluation of returned function (according to Yanagihara's 40-point scale and the grading system of House-Brackmann) and the scores (full marks: 100 points) the patients assigned to their own facial movements. Instead the scores that the patients assigned were closely related to subjective oral dysfunction, such as difficulty in masticating, articulating, and swallowing. Those scores did not correlate with eye-related functional deficits. These findings indicate that modified techniques to minimize the hypoglossal nerve deficit may enhance patient satisfaction without sacrificing recovery of facial movements.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000068662 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!