Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In vitro antibacterial activity of fosfomycin was evaluated by various methods. Strains of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Escherichia coli were much more susceptible when glucose-6-phosphate was added to the test medium, but strains of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not affected. Nutrient agar instead of Mueller-Hinton agar allowed to exhibiting the higher activity of fosfomycin against all the species tested. The activity of fosfomycin was as equivalent or superior to those of cefazolin, cefmetazole, cefotiam and piperacillin. The susceptibility of strains isolated during 2000 to 2001 to fosfomycin was almost the same as that of the isolates reported in 1975. Fosfomycin was considered to show high efficacy in several infections, since it has maintained its favorable antibacterial activities against several bacterial species for more than 20 years after the first application to clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!