Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A frequency comparison was carried out between iodine-stabilized Nd:YAG lasers at 532 nm from the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, the Centre for Metrology and Accreditation, the Czech Metrology Institute, and the Bureau National de Métrologie-Institut National de Métrologie. The frequency differences between lasers, as well as the frequency reproducibility of each system,were investigated. Pressure-, modulation-, and power-induced shifts were studied. A frequency dispersion (1 sigma) of 3.5 kHz (6.2 x 10(-12) in relative terms) with an average reproducibility for each laser of the order of 0.4 kHz (7.1 x 10(-13) in relative terms) was observed over the duration of the comparison. Relative stabilities better than 1 x 10(13) at 1 s were demonstrated for the third-harmonic systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.42.001019 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!