AI Article Synopsis

  • The study surveyed postdoctoral fellows in clinical neuropsychology about their views on training standards and recommendations.
  • Approximately 44% of the 78 training directors responded, revealing that most fellows were trained in Ph.D. programs in clinical psychology.
  • Respondents emphasized that continuing education does not adequately replace formal training, with over half of their internship and residency experiences focused on clinical neuropsychology in hospital settings.

Article Abstract

The present study was designed to survey postdoctoral fellows in clinical neuropsychology about their perceptions of a variety of training standards and recommendations. Survey packets were mailed to the 78 training directors listed in Cripe's (1998) most recent listing of postdoctoral training programs at the time of survey. A response rate of 44% was achieved. Results were notable in that most fellows had been trained in clinical psychology, and mostly in Ph.D. programs. Approximately half had been trained and/or supervised by diplomates in clinical neuropsychology from the American Board of Professional Psychology. Continuing education was judged by respondents to be an insufficient substitute for formal training. Most respondents completed internships and postdoctoral residencies in a hospital setting, with greater than 50% of their time devoted to clinical neuropsychology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.3.221.13847DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical neuropsychology
16
postdoctoral fellows
8
clinical
5
national survey
4
survey clinical
4
neuropsychology
4
postdoctoral
4
neuropsychology postdoctoral
4
fellows study
4
study designed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!