A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differentiation between fore- and hindlimb bones and locomotor behaviour in primates. | LitMetric

Differentiation between fore- and hindlimb bones and locomotor behaviour in primates.

Folia Primatol (Basel)

Division of Anthropology, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo,Tokyo, Japan.

Published: June 2003

Primate appendicular limb bones were measured on the cross-sectional geometry at the mid-length of the humerus and femur and on the external dimensions of long bones of the same individuals. Cross sections were directly measured by means of computer tomography or direct sectioning. The morphometry of bones and locomotor behaviour is discussed from the viewpoint of the functional differentiation between the fore- and hindlimbs. The primate group which daily adopted a relatively terrestrial locomotor type demonstrates robust forelimb bones compared with the group which adopted a fully arboreal locomotor type. In contrast, the arboreal group showed relatively large and long hindlimb bones. The difference resembled the previously reported comparison between terrestrial and arboreal groups among wholly quadrupedal mammals. Humans were more similar to the arboreal group than to the terrestrial group. Parameters of the cross-sectional geometry showed a slightly positive allometry in total primate species. Slopes of the parameters were explained by the influence of muscle force.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000068391DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differentiation fore-
8
hindlimb bones
8
bones locomotor
8
locomotor behaviour
8
cross-sectional geometry
8
locomotor type
8
arboreal group
8
bones
6
group
5
fore- hindlimb
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!