A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse. | LitMetric

Senescence of the temporal impulse response to a luminous pulse.

Vision Res

Department of Information Systems Engineering, Kochi University of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada-town, Kami-gun, Kochi 782-8502, Japan.

Published: March 2003

An impulse response function (IRF) to a luminous pulse was derived for 70 normal observers ranging in age from 16 to 86 years. Thresholds were measured for two pulses separated by interstimulus intervals from 6.7 to 180 ms. The pulses had a spatial Gaussian shape (+/-1SD=2.3 degrees diam) and were presented as increments on a 10 cd/m(2) background, having the same chromaticity as the pulse. A spatial 4-alternative forced-choice method was combined with a staircase procedure. Retinal illuminance was equated individually by heterochromatic flicker photometry and control of pupil area. Each IRF was measured four times, in separate sessions, for each observer. IRFs calculated from the threshold data revealed significant age-related changes in the response amplitude of both excitatory and inhibitory phases. In general, there were no significant changes in the time to the first peak or in the first zero crossing. For 12 of 20 observers over 60 years of age, however, the amplitude of the second (inhibitory) phase was reduced relative to the excitatory phase so their IRFs were quite slow and long. Control conditions with three pseudophakic observers and two normal observers with induced blur demonstrated that age-related changes in the IRF under these conditions cannot be ascribed to optical factors. The data suggest that the human visual system generally maintains a stable speed of response to a flash until at least about 80 years of age, even while there are senescent reductions in response signal amplitude.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2774211PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00009-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impulse response
8
luminous pulse
8
normal observers
8
age-related changes
8
years age
8
response
5
senescence temporal
4
temporal impulse
4
response luminous
4
pulse impulse
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!