Background: To compare the corneal healing response between conventional and phototherapeutic keratectomy through a masking agent, in rabbit corneas.

Methods: 24 adult rabbits underwent phototherapeutic keratectomy. Animals were divided in two groups: 12 received photoablation through a masking agent (PALM gel) and the remaining 12 received conventional phototherapeutic keratectomy of equal depth and served as control. Light and transmission electron microscopy was performed in specimens of both groups obtained: immediately after, four hours, one week, one, three and six months after treatment.

Results: Reepitheliazation was complete within five days in all eyes. Light and transmission electron microscopy did not reveal any differences of the healing process in the experimental eyes compared to the controls.

Conclusion: Photoablation through the PALM technique did not result any evident alterations of the reepithelisation and stromal healing process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151685PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-3-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phototherapeutic keratectomy
16
palm technique
8
conventional phototherapeutic
8
masking agent
8
light transmission
8
transmission electron
8
electron microscopy
8
healing process
8
technique histological
4
histological findings
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!