Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this prospective study was to determine if a connecting bar prevented mechanical failure of hip spicas. Eighty-two hip spicas were applied to 70 patients between April 2000 and June 2001 following open or closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Bilateral hip surgery was undertaken in 12 patients. Thirty-six spicas were applied with a bar whilst 46 were without. The technique of application was similar in all patients. Overall nine (11%) hip spicas failed (mechanically) prematurely and had to be replaced in hospital under general anaesthesia. All nine were inpatients whose spica did not have a connecting bar (P < 0.005). The rate of spica revision increased with the age of the patient. All parents of failed spica cases (nine cases) preferred the new spica with a bar to the previous one without, because they agreed that the bar made the spica more secure. The bar did not hamper toileting or handling.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.bpb.0000049572.53117.bb | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!