Purpose: Tumor invasion in patients with early invasive colorectal cancer has been classified into four levels proposed by Haggitt. Level 4 invasion into the submucosa has been defined as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis; however, the false-positive rate remains high. This study was designed to determine risk factors for lymph node and distant metastases in addition to Haggitt's Level 4 invasion.

Methods: Seventy-one of 142 patients with submucosa-invasive colorectal cancer underwent intestinal resection as an initial surgical treatment between 1975 and 2000. The subjects of this study were 65 of these 71 patients, all of whom were diagnosed as having Haggitt's Level 4 invasion. The depth, width, and area of submucosal invasion were measured with an image analyzer.

Results: Lymph node metastasis was noted in 11 (16.9 percent) of the 65 patients. There were no significant differences in the depth or area of submucosal invasion between node-positive and node-negative patients. However, the width of submucosal invasion was significantly greater in node-positive than in node-negative patients (P = 0.001). When 5-mm-wide submucosal invasion was used as an indicator for intestinal resection, 37 patients were found to have indications for bowel resection, and 11 (29.7 percent) of the 37 had lymph node metastases. Distant metastasis was noted in five patients (7.7 percent). The depth, width, and area of submucosal invasion in patients with distant metastasis did not differ significantly from those without distant metastasis.

Conclusion: Although further prospective investigation is required, the positive predictive value increases from 17 to 30 percent when the width of submucosal invasion is added to Haggitt's Level 4 as an indicator for bowel resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6525-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

submucosal invasion
24
lymph node
20
haggitt's level
16
colorectal cancer
12
level invasion
12
area submucosal
12
invasion
11
patients
10
node distant
8
distant metastases
8

Similar Publications

Background: Ultra-low rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) presents technical challenges due to anatomical features. The objective of this research was to determine the risk factors linked to unsuccessful curative resections and to create a nomogram predictive model to assess the likelihood of encountering technical challenges.

Methods: Patients with ultra-low rectal tumors received ESD form June 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transcervical resection of myoma (TCRM): Part I.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol

January 2025

Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Uterine fibroids occur frequently in women during the reproductive age, and they are rarely associated with clinical meaning because of their benign characteristics and asymptomatic clinical presentation. Sometimes, uterine fibroids are symptomatic and associated with compression syndrome, infertility, chronic pelvic pain and heavy menstrual bleeding. All need further intervention and treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized procedure for intramucosal and slightly invasive submucosal colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the role of ESD for T1b (depth of submucosal invasion: ≥1,000 μm) CRC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESD for T1b CRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is considered an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for esophageal subepithelial lesions (SELs) with maximal dilameter less than 3.0 cm, yet its efficacy for lesions over 3.0 cm remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential to predict histology and select the best treatment strategy but remains very difficult. Instead of the recommended endoscopic characterization, many gastroenterologists routinely perform biopsies of the lesion to propose endoscopic resection with or without R0 intent. The aim of this study was to determine which of endoscopic characterization or biopsies, either targeted (TB) or non-targeted (NTB), is the most effective to determine the best treatment strategy for colorectal neoplasia > 2 cm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!