In recent years the cochlear implant has been a subject of much discussion and controversy. The clinician has often been confused by the conflicting reports of success and failure. In this paper the development of the cochlear implant is reviewed and its present status summarized. It is hoped that the clinician may thereby gain an understanding of this device so that he can better evaluate its present and future status. Selection of Patients for Cochlear Implantation. The cochlear implant will benefit only those patients with hair cell loss who have remaining viable auditory neurons. In order to determine whether viable neurons remain, an electric current is passed through a small needle which is place into the promontory through the tympanic membrane. If patients experience an auditory sensation as a result of this electrical stimulation, it is felt that they are suitable candidates for a cochlear implant. Feasibility of Long-Term VIIIth Nerve Stimulation. Many questions have been raised regarding the feasibility of long-term stimulation of the auditory nerve. The first question raised was whether the auditory nerve would survive severe hair cell degeneration. Studies have shown that in most cases at least a few auditory neurons remain. The next question was whether the cochlear implant itself would destroy the remaining auditory neurons. Preliminary studies have shown that the nerve will survive the placement of electrodes both into the modiolus and the scala tympani. Several electrode materials and insulation have been found to be well tolerated, and there has been minimal damage from thermal or electrolytic processes; therefore, it appears feasible to stimulate the auditory nerve over a long period. Information Transfer by Electrical Stimulation. Single-channel stimulation produces only periodicity pitch, and information transfer is insufficient for speech discrimination. Experience to date indicates that it will be possible to produce both place and volley pitch by electrical stimulation with multiple electrodes in the scala tympani. These findings give promise for the feasibility of producing a device which will transfer sufficient information to produce speech discrimination. Present Status of the Cochlear Implant. To the present time 15 patients have been implanted with a unipolar electrode under the direction of the Ear Research Institute. These patients have all benefited from their devices. They are able to perceive background sounds and receive a cadence or rhythm to speech which makes the device helpful in lipreading. None of the patients have developed significant speech discrimination.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197603000-00007 | DOI Listing |
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Audiology, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address:
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between parental attitudes and language development in preschool children with cochlear implants. In addition, the study aimed to examine parental attitudes in relation to socio-demographic and cochlear implant related variables.
Methods: This study is based on the relational survey model.
IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process
February 2024
CRSS: Center for Robust Speech Systems; Cochlear Implant Processing Laboratory (CILab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.
The presence of background noise or competing talkers is one of the main communication challenges for cochlear implant (CI) users in speech understanding in naturalistic spaces. These external factors distort the time-frequency (T-F) content including magnitude spectrum and phase of speech signals. While most existing speech enhancement (SE) solutions focus solely on enhancing the magnitude response, recent research highlights the importance of phase in perceptual speech quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNatl J Maxillofac Surg
November 2024
Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Exploring diverse biomaterials and implants in the ear, nose, and throat by understanding adverse effects and post-usage events. Literature was obtained from Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on original research studies, case reports, and case series spanning from December 2010 to May 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups
December 2024
DeVault Otologic Research Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Purpose: Cochlear implants (CIs) have improved the quality of life for many children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Despite the reported CI benefits of improved speech recognition, speech intelligibility, and spoken language processing, large individual differences in speech and language outcomes are still consistently reported in the literature. The enormous variability in CI outcomes has made it challenging to predict which children may be at high risk for limited benefits and how potential risk factors can be improved with interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Otolaryngol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Background: There is conflicting literature regarding whether cochlear implants (CI) electrode array (EA) selection impacts audiologic outcomes.
Objective: To compare outcomes for the two EA designs, precurved and straight.
Methods: A systematic search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and SCOPUS was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!