Background & Objective: There are many factors affect the prognosis of the patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma who underwent intubation, however, it is unclear which ones are main causes so far. This study was designed to analyze the prognostic factors of unresectable esophageal carcinoma after stenting in order to find the reasonable modalities of palliative therapy.

Methods: Consecutive 102 patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma who were eligible for inclusion criteria were analyzed after stenting. Twelve factors including gender, age tumor site, tumor length, stricture degree in diameter, pathologic type, grade of cell differentiation, clinical tumor stage (T, N, M), pre-stenting therapy and post-stenting therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) were used for Cox regression model analysis. The survival rate was calculated by life table.

Results: The technical sucess rate of stenting was 98.3%. There were significant improvement on the grade of swallowing function (P = 0.000) and quality of life (KPS scores, P = 0.000). The incidence rate of complications was 43.1% (44/102). The survival rates of 3, 6, 9, 12 months were 67.53%, 40.59%, 27.43%, and 18.65%, respectively. The results of Cox regression showed that invasion degree of primary tumor (T, P = 0.0410) and distal metastasis (M, P = 0.006) were the statistically significant prognostic factors. The odds ratio(ORT) was 1.750 (95% CI, 0.996-3.074) on T stage of primary carcinoma, ORM was 1.527 (95% CI, 1.126-2.069) on M stage. There was no statistical significance in the survival of the patients affected by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after intubation.

Conclusion: T stage and M stage are the major prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma after stenting. There is no benefit for survival of patients treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after intubation.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unresectable esophageal
20
esophageal carcinoma
20
prognostic factors
16
patients unresectable
12
radiotherapy and/or
12
and/or chemotherapy
12
survival patients
12
factors unresectable
8
carcinoma stenting
8
cox regression
8

Similar Publications

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable (T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the prognosis is poor. Borderline resectable (T3br) ESCC has been discussed, but its clinical features and appropriate treatment are unclear. The effects of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy and subsequent surgery for potentially unresectable ESCC remain controversial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy combined with programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (sintilimab) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) plus sintilimab, and subsequent maintenance with sintilimab (IC-ICCRT-IO) for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a retrospective study.

Methods: Data from patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, inoperable ESCC who received IC-ICCRT-IO were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment effects were evaluated after 2 cycles of induction therapy and after CCRT by contrast-enhanced CT scans and esophagograms, followed by subsequent evaluations every 3 months post-treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that is amenable to embolisation; however, median progression-free survival is still approximately 7 months. We aimed to assess whether adding durvalumab, with or without bevacizumab, might improve progression-free survival.

Methods: In this multiregional, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (EMERALD-1), adults aged 18 years or older with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to embolisation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 at enrolment, and at least one measurable intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were enrolled at 157 medical sites including research centres and general and specialist hospitals in 18 countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this work is to establish recommendations for the preoperative evaluation and selection of patients with malignant oesophageal neoplasms, who are candidates for surgical resection with curative intent, based on the consensus established by a group of experts. Using the Delphi methodolgy and after 2 rounds of evaluation, responses were obtained from 37 experts to 47 questions about the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer, considering consensus if there was a mean score greater than 8 (range between 0 to 10). Of the respondents, 54% were women, with a mean age of 50.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) often occurs in the elderly, with approximately 33% of patients aged ≥ 75 years at the time of diagnosis.

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic factors for radiotherapy (RT) in elderly patients with unresectable EC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, toxic reactions, and survival information of EC patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent intensity-modulated RT at Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January 2016 and September 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!