A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Aerobic exercise physiology in a professional rugby union team. | LitMetric

Aerobic exercise physiology in a professional rugby union team.

Int J Cardiol

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.

Published: February 2003

Introduction: In professional rugby, different positional roles may require different levels of aerobic fitness. Forward and backline players from a team of elite rugby players were tested to evaluate the differences between the two groups.

Methods: 28 male players, 15 backs and 13 forwards, underwent maximal treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), lung spirometry, a 3 km timed run, and body fat measurement.

Results: Peak oxygen uptake was higher in backs than in forwards (peak VO(2) 48.3+/-2.1 vs. 41.2+/-2.7 ml kg(-1) min(-1), P<0.05) with no significant difference in peak respiratory exchange ratio (1.08+/-0.02 vs. 1.07+/-0.02, P=NS), exercise time (1306+/-39.7 vs. 1217+/-25.1 s, P=NS) or time for 3 km run (667.5+/-14.1 vs. 699.0+/-20.7 s, P=NS). However, the forwards were taller and heavier (height 190.2+/-2.2 vs. 179.5+/-1.3 cm, P<0.001, body mass 104+/-2.4 vs. 86.3+/-1.7 kg, P<0.0001) and had a higher fat content (body fat percentage 12.8+/-0.8 vs. 9.7+/-0.6%, P<0.01) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1, 4.9+/-0.1 vs. 4.5+/-0.2 l, P<0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between peak VO(2), 3 km run time (r=-0.45, P<0.05) and weight (r=-0.54, P<0.003) for all subjects.

Conclusion: Backline players have a higher peak oxygen uptake per kilogram than forwards, although the cardiopulmonary exercise test duration, degree of anaerobic metabolism and 3 km run time are not significantly different. These results could be due to the two groups' different body structure, being shorter, lighter and having a lower percentage body fat. These differences, which are likely to be a result of selection for specific roles in the game, should be taken into account when evaluating aerobic fitness within a rugby team.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00211-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

professional rugby
8
backs forwards
8
aerobic exercise
4
exercise physiology
4
physiology professional
4
rugby union
4
union team
4
team introduction
4
introduction professional
4
rugby positional
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!