Cardiogenic shock: a summary of the randomized SHOCK trial.

Congest Heart Fail

Division of Cardiology, St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center, Columbia University, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10025, USA.

Published: April 2003

Cardiogenic shock is the most common cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial randomly assigned 302 patients with predominant left ventricular failure following an acute myocardial infarction to a strategy of emergency revascularization or initial medical stabilization. Emergency revascularization by either coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty was required within 6 hours of randomization. Patients assigned to initial medical stabilization could undergo delayed revascularization at a minimum of 54 hours post-randomization. The primary end point of the study was 30-day all-cause mortality. Overall survival at 30 days did not differ significantly between the emergency revascularization and initial medical stabilization groups (53% vs. 44%; p=0.109). However, at the 6- and 12-month follow-up, there was a significant survival benefit with early revascularization (50% vs. 37%; p=0.027 and 47% vs. 34%; p=0.025, respectively). The benefit appeared to be greatest for those less than 75 years of age, with 20 lives saved at 6 months per 100 patients treated. According to the results of the SHOCK trial, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for myocardial infarction now recommend emergency revascularization for patients younger than 75 years with cardiogenic shock.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2003.tb00020.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiogenic shock
16
emergency revascularization
16
shock trial
12
myocardial infarction
12
initial medical
12
medical stabilization
12
acute myocardial
8
revascularization initial
8
shock
6
revascularization
6

Similar Publications

Background: Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) in cardiac surgery is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Beside other therapeutic measures (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ECLS-SHOCK and DanGer Shock: Implications for optimal temporary mechanical circulatory support use for cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction.

Can J Cardiol

January 2025

University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM) Cardiovascular Center & Research Center (CRCHUM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address:

Despite concerted efforts to rapidly identify patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and provide timely revascularization, early mortality remains stubbornly high. While artificially augmenting systemic flow through the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices would be expected to reduce the rate of progression to multi-organ dysfunction and thereby enhance survival, reliable evidence for benefit has remained elusive with lingering questions regarding the appropriate selection of both patients and devices, as well as the timing of device implantation relative to other critical interventions. Further complicating matters are the resource-intensive multidisciplinary systems of care that must be brought to bear in this complex patient population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Incidence and predictors of weaning failure from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Eur J Heart Fail

January 2025

Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate incidence and predictors of weaning failure and in-hospital death after successful weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS).

Methods And Results: Overall, 685 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO from 23 tertiary care centres in 7 countries were analysed (median age 57 [interquartile range 49-66] years, 542 [79.1%] male, median lactate 7.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is a widely-used mechanical circulatory support device that enhances hemodynamics in patients with heart conditions. Although the IABP is a common clinical tool, its effectiveness in enhancing outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock remains disputed. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intra-aortic dual-balloon pump (IADBP) and its impact on aortic hemodynamics compared with an IABP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a 30-50% in-hospital mortality rate, with little improvement in outcomes in the last decade. Challenges in improving outcomes are closely linked to the frequent late presentation or diagnosis of CS where the 'point of no return' has often passed, leading to haemodynamic dysregulation, progressive myocardial depression, hypotension, and a downward spiral of hypoperfusion, organ dysfunction and decreasing myocardial function, driven by inflammation and metabolic derangements. Novel therapeutic interventions may have varying efficacy depending on the type and stage of shock in which they are applied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!