This study was designed to test the hypothesis that maturity of moral judgment is related to moral behavior and to certain personality characteristics. The Ss, 33 fifth grade boys (approximately 10 1/2-years of age), were given the Kohlberg test of moral judgment, and scores on this test were related to a measure of general intelligence, moral conduct as judged by peers (sociometric nominations), honesty in a structured test, and certain personality variables. Maturity of moral judgment was found to be significantly correlated with general cognitive ability (intelligence test performance) and, even with intelligence partialed out, with resistance to temptation, reputation for being concerned with the welfare of others, self-confidence, and security in social relationships with peers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1976.10533980 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Evaluation of sociodemographic, clinical and forensic medical characteristics of juvenile delinquents in Turkey.
Psychiatr Psychol Law
January 2024
Adiyaman Branch Office, The Council of Forensic Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkey.
It is accepted all over the world that children whose biological, psychological, cognitive, moral and social development processes are ongoing and whose value judgments are not sufficiently developed should not be punished or that punishment reductions should be applied. This study retrospectively analyzed the variables in a Turkish sample of 315 cases in which the criminal responsibility of children (83.5% boys and 16.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMoral Complexity in Traffic: Advancing the ADC Model for Automated Driving Systems.
Sci Eng Ethics
January 2025
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
The incorporation of ethical settings in Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) has been extensively discussed in recent years with the goal of enhancing potential stakeholders' trust in the new technology. However, a comprehensive ethical framework for ADS decision-making, capable of merging multiple ethical considerations and investigating their consistency is currently missing. This paper addresses this gap by providing a taxonomy of ADS decision-making based on the Agent-Deed-Consequences (ADC) model of moral judgment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Moral Psychological Justification of Anger: An Exploration of Self-Respect and Recognition.
Behav Sci (Basel)
December 2024
School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
In the field of moral psychology, traditional perspectives often evaluate anger based on its consequences, either validating or condemning it for its perceived benefits or harms. This paper argues for a shift in focus from the outcomes of anger to its moral and psychological foundations. By integrating insights from psychological research, this study posits that the fundamental nature of anger is intrinsically linked to the quest for recognition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe impact of moral judgment on bystanders' interpersonal trust: the mediating role of trustworthiness.
Front Psychol
January 2025
Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Interpersonal trust is the premise and foundation of encouraging cooperation in this age of rapid progress. The purpose of this study was to investigate how moral judgment affects bystanders' interpersonal trust and its internal mechanisms when there are ethical transgressions. The moral judgment of the evaluators was divided into three categories-opposition, neutrality and approval-on the basis of the moral transgressions of the offenders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResource-Rational Virtual Bargaining for Moral Judgment: Toward a Probabilistic Cognitive Model.
Top Cogn Sci
January 2025
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Recent theoretical work has argued that moral psychology can be understood through the lens of "resource rational contractualism." The view posits that the best way of making a decision that affects other people is to get everyone together to negotiate under idealized conditions. The outcome of that negotiation is an arrangement (or "contract") that would lead to mutual benefit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!