A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pacemaker therapy in isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block. | LitMetric

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pacemaker (PM) therapy in patients with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB). Patients with CCAVB eventually quality for PM implantation, however, timing remains controversial. Retrospective evaluation of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), shortening fraction (SF), and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) in 149 CCAVB patients, before, at, and after PM implantation was carried out. LVEDD shows an average increase of 0.48%/month in non-PM patients, and an average decrease of 0.88%/month in PM patients. SF shows an average increase of 0.10%/month in non-PM, and an average decrease of 0.32%/month in PM patients. CTR shows an average increase of 0.02%/month in non-PM, and an average decrease of 0.19%/month in PM patients. The difference between the non-PM and PM groups is significant (P = 0.05) for all variables. Symptomatic patients show no significant change in LVEDD after PM therapy (from 66.5% before to 68.5% after PM therapy). Asymptomatic patients do show a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in LVEDD after PM therapy (from 78.4% before to 73.3% after PM therapy). CTR does not differ significantly between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients before PM therapy (58% and 57%, respectively). CTR does differ significantly (P < 0.001) between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients after PM therapy (52% and 48%, respectively). Heart size and SF are increased in most patients with isolated CCAVB. PM implantation is associated with a decrease in heart size and normalization of SF in most patients. Indications for PM therapy in children may require reevaluation in asymptomatic patients with increased cardiac size and decreased cardiac function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01685.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asymptomatic patients
16
patients
14
average increase
12
average decrease
12
pacemaker therapy
8
isolated congenital
8
congenital complete
8
complete atrioventricular
8
atrioventricular block
8
therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!