The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which different screening strategies could identify a population of nondiabetic relatives of a proband with type 1 diabetes who had two or more immunologic markers from the group consisting of islet cell antibodies (ICA), micro insulin autoantibodies (MIAA), GAD65 autoantibodies (GAA), and ICA512 autoantibodies (ICA512AA). Relatives of subjects with type 1 diabetes were screened for ICA as part of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. A total of 71,148 samples were also tested for GAA and ICA512AA. IAA results were available on 17,207 of these samples using a protein A/protein G MIAA assay as well. The study population was defined to be those in which all four antibodies were tested. There were 1010 (5.9%) relatives with a single autoantibody on initial screening and 394 (2.3%) with two or more autoantibodies. GAA was more sensitive than ICA [GAA, 91% (357 of 394); ICA, 82% (324 of 394)] in the detection of multiple antibody-positive individuals. The addition of ICA512AA to GAA as a screening test increased sensitivity to 97% (381 of 394), whereas adding ICA512AA to ICA as a screening test increased sensitivity to 93% (367 of 394). GAA and ICA identified somewhat nonoverlapping subgroups of multiple antibody-positive subjects. Thus, the substitution of GAA or ICA for the other failed to detect 8-17% of multiple antibody subjects. Higher ICA titers were associated with increased percentages of multiple antibody-positive subjects; 86% of subjects having Juvenile Diabetes Foundation titers of at least 160 were positive for two or more antibodies. A screening strategy combining GAA and ICA512AA resulted in a higher sensitivity than using any marker individually, although statistically it was not significantly higher than using GAA alone. Screening for any three antibodies guaranteed that all multiple antibody-positive subjects were detected. Screening for two antibodies at one time and testing for the remaining antibodies among those who are positive for one resulted in a sensitivity of 99% for GAA and ICA, 97% for GAA and MIAA or GAA and ICA512AA, 93% for ICA512AA and ICA, 92% for MIAA and ICA, and 73% for ICA512AA and MIAA. From a laboratory perspective, screenings for GAA, ICA512AA, and MIAA are semiautomated tests with high throughput that, if used as initial screen, would identify at first testing 67% of the 2.3% of multiple antibody-positive relatives (100% if antibody-positive subjects are subsequently tested for ICA) as well as 4.7% of relatives with a single biochemical autoantibody, some of whom may convert to multiple autoantibody positivity on follow-up. Testing for ICA among relatives with one biochemical antibody would identify the remaining 33% of multiple antibody-positive relatives. Further follow-up and analysis of actual progression to diabetes will be essential to define actual diabetes risk in this large cohort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020760DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multiple antibody-positive
28
gaa ica512aa
16
antibody-positive subjects
16
ica
13
antibody-positive relatives
12
type diabetes
12
gaa
12
gaa ica
12
multiple
9
ica512aa
9

Similar Publications

New Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare and severe condition characterized by refractory seizures in individuals without a prior history of epilepsy. This case report describes a 37-year-old woman diagnosed with anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (anti-GAD65) antibody-positive encephalitis-related NORSE. Her seizures were refractory to multiple interventions, including anti-seizure medications, anesthetics, immunotherapies, a ketogenic diet, and electroconvulsive therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Virus encephalitis (VE), recognized as one of the common kinds of central nervous system (CNS) diseases after virus infection, has a surprising correlation with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) when autoimmune antibodies emerge in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum. Herpes simplex virus and Epstein-Barr virus are the most critical agents worldwide. By molecular mimicry, herpes viruses can invade the brain directly or indirectly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Distinguishing Transient From Persistent Brain Structural Changes in Pediatric Patients With Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis.

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm

January 2025

From the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.); Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Division of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Pediatric Neurology, Olgahospital/Klinikum Stuttgart; Department of Paediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital Datteln, Witten/Herdecke University and Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Background And Objectives: Pediatric patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) are at risk of impaired brain growth, with long-term neuropsychiatric consequences. We previously reported transient expansions of cerebral ventricle volume (VV) in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, which subsequently normalized. In this study, we investigated changes in VV in ADEM in relation to other brain structures and clinical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantitative Contribution of Clinical Attacks to Residual Disability in Patients With AQP4-Antibody Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Neurology

January 2025

From the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.C., A.F., R.G., M.I.S.L., J.P.), Oxford University Hospitals, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (B.C.), Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science of Technology, Wuhan, China; University Hospitals Sussex National Health Service Foundation Trust (S.A.C.), Brighton; Centre for Preventive Neurology (R.D.), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London; Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre (Y.H.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London; Department of Paediatric Neurology (Y.H.), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London; Department of Neurology (C. Halfpenny), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Neurology (C. Hemingway), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London and Institute of Neurology; Department of Neurology (J.C.H.), University of Plymouth Faculty of Health and University Hospitals; Department of Ophthalmology (E.O.S.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London; Department of Neurology (W.R.), St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London; Department of Neurology (R.J.M.), Gloucestershire Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust; Department of Neurology (V.W.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London; Department of Neurology (V.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London; Department of Paediatric Neurology (S.R.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford; and Neurology Department (R.G.), Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Foundation Health Trust, Slough, United Kingdom.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how clinical attacks contribute to ongoing disability in patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD).
  • A total of 165 patients were analyzed using disability scores recorded after at least six months post-attack, with findings showing a significant increase in disability scores correlating with the number and type of relapses.
  • Results indicated that specific relapse types, particularly the combination of transverse myelitis and optic neuritis, had the most substantial impact on increasing residual disability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prevalence of Progression Independent of Relapse Activity and Relapse-Associated Worsening in Patients With AQP4-IgG-Positive NMOSD.

Neurology

December 2024

From the Department of Neuroscience (P.S., A.V.D.W., P.G.S., Y.C.F., W.Z.Y., C.Z., V.G.J., H.B., M.M.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria; Department of Neurology (P.S., A.V.D.W., P.G.S., Y.C.F., W.Z.Y., V.G.J., H.B., M.M.), Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (P.S., S.H.), Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Neuroimmunology Centre (S.S., I.R., T.K.), Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville; CORe (S.S., I.R., T.K.), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria; Royal Hobart Hospital (Y.C.F.), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Nehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis Center (S.J.K.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary; Department of Neurology (B.W.), Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem; Translational Neurosciences Research Group (B.W.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine (M.E.), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; Neurology (M.E.), Dr. Etemadifar MS Institute, Isfahan, Iran; Izmir University of Economics (S.O.), Medical Point Hospital; Multiple Sclerosis Research Association (S.O.), Izmir, Turkey; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (P.N., D.H.), First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (A.A.), School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey; College of Medicine & Health Sciences and Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (A.A.-A.), Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khodh, Oman; Department of Neuroscience (C.M.R.-T.), Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Department of Neurology (G.L.), University Hospital Ghent, Belgium; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies (F.P.), GF Ingrassia, Catania, Italy; Multiple Sclerosis Unit (F.P.), AOU Policlinico G Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania; Department of Neuroscience (M.F.), MS Center, Neurology Unit, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB) (M.F.), University of L'Aquila, Italy; Department of Neurology (C.B.), Karadeniz Technical University, Medical Faculty, Trabzon, Turkey; Department of Neurology (P.A.M.), Royal Brisbane Hospital; University of Queensland (P.A.M.), Australia; Department of Neurology (R.T.), Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Hunter Medical Research Institute (J.L.-S.), Neurology, University of Newcastle; and Hunter New England Health (J.L.-S.), John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigated the prevalence of two types of disability progression in patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG NMOSD): Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) and Relapse-Associated Worsening (RAW).
  • It included 181 patients from the MSBase registry, mostly females with an average age of 38.1 years, monitored for an average of 4.5 years, where only 2.2% experienced PIRA and 7.2% experienced RAW.
  • The findings suggest PIRA is rare in AQP4-IgG NMOSD cases, but the study had limitations, such as using
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!