Interventions aimed at improving immunization rates.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

Centre for Public Health Practice, University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, CB# 7400, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Published: February 2003

Background: Immunization rates for children and adults are rising, but coverage levels have not reached national goals. As a result of low immunization rates, vaccine-preventable diseases still occur. In an era of increasing complexity of immunization schedules, rising expectations about the performance of primary care, and large demands on primary care physicians, it is important to understand and promote interventions that work in primary care settings to increase immunization coverage. A common theme across immunization programs in all nations involves the challenge of determining the denominator of eligible recipients (e.g., all children who should receive the measles vaccine), and identifying the best strategy to ensure high vaccination rates. Strategies have focused on patient-oriented interventions (e.g., patient reminders), provider interventions, and system interventions. One intervention strategy involves patient reminder/recall systems.

Objectives: Assess the effectiveness of patient reminder/recall systems in improving immunization rates, and compare the effects of various types of reminders in different settings or patient populations.

Search Strategy: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE (1966-1998) and 4 other bibliographic databases: EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and CAB Abstracts. Authors also performed a search of EPOC in April 2001 to update the review. Two authors reviewed the lists of titles and abstracts, and used the inclusion criteria to mark potentially relevant articles for full review. The reference lists of all relevant articles and reviews were back searched for additional studies. Publications of abstracts, proceedings from scientific meetings, and files of study collaborators were also searched for references.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA), and interrupted time series (ITS) studies written in English.

Types Of Participants: Health care personnel who deliver immunizations and children (birth to 18 years) or adults (18 years and up) who receive immunizations in any setting. Types of interventions: Any intervention that falls within the Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) scope and that includes patient reminder and/or recall in at least one arm of the study. Types of outcome measures: Immunization rates, or the proportion of the target population up-to-date on recommended immunizations. Outcomes were acceptable for either individual vaccinations (e.g., influenza vaccination) or standard combinations of recommended vaccinations (e.g., all recommended vaccinations by a specific date or age).

Data Collection: Each study was read independently by two reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by a formal reconciliation process to achieve consensus.

Analysis: Results are presented for individual studies as relative rates for randomized controlled trials, and as absolute changes in percentage points for controlled before and after studies. Pooled results were presented using the random effects model.

Main Results: Patient reminder/recall systems were effective in improving immunization rates in 33 of 41 included studies, irrespective of baseline immunization rates, patient ages, type of setting, or type of vaccination. Increases in immunization rates due to reminders were in the range of 5 to 20 percentage points. Reminders were effective for childhood vaccinations (OR=2.02, 95% CI =1.49,2.72), childhood influenza vaccinations (OR=4.19, 95% CI =2.07,8.49), adult pneumococcus or tetanus (OR=5.14, 95%CI = 1.21, 21.8), and adult influenza vaccinations (OR=2.29, 95%CI = 1.69, 3.10). While reminders were most effective in academic settings (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.98, 5.58), they were also highly effective in private practice settings (OR=1.79, 95% CI = 1.45, 2.22) and public health clinics (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.42, 3.07). All types of reminders were effective (postcards, letters, telephone or autodialer calls), with telephone being the most effective but most costly.

Reviewer's Conclusions: Patient reminder/recall systems in primary care settings are effective in improving immunization rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003941DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immunization rates
36
improving immunization
16
primary care
16
patient reminder/recall
16
immunization
12
reminder/recall systems
12
reminders effective
12
rates
11
care settings
8
patient
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Infants and young children typically have the highest age-related risk of invasive meningococcal disease. The immunogenicity and safety of a single primary dose and a booster of a meningococcal A/C/W/Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT; Nimenrix) in infants were evaluated.

Methods: In this phase 3b, open-label, single-arm study, healthy 3-month-old infants received a single Nimenrix dose followed by a booster at age 12 months (1 + 1 series).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite global declines in cervical cancer incidence, certain regions observe unexpected rising trends among younger generations.

Methods: This study uses the age-period-cohort model to examine long-term incidence trends of invasive cervical cancer in Taiwan. Data were sourced from the Taiwan Cancer Registry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has improved our ability to characterize rare cell populations. In practice, cells from different tissues or donors are simultaneously loaded onto the instrument (multiplexed) at the recommended (standard loading) or higher (superloading) numbers to save time and money. Although cost-effective, superloading can stymie computational analyses owing to high multiplet rates and sample complexity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

HPV vaccine hesitancy in the United States.

Curr Opin Pediatr

January 2025

Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Purpose Of Review: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STI and accounts for roughly 37 000 HPV-associated cancers annually in the United States. Despite documented safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine, vaccination rates should be higher. We summarize literature surrounding vaccine hesitancy, a main reason for suboptimal vaccine coverage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Owing to persistent concerns about side effects, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in Japan have remained low. Pharmacists are therefore encouraged to improve vaccination rates by providing accurate information. This study evaluated the impact of educational interventions on pharmacists' knowledge and willingness to recommend the HPV vaccine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!