A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Usefulness of multiplex-PCR for identification of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar]. | LitMetric

We evaluated the usefulness of a multiplex-PCR method for differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar, which are morphologically indistinguishable species. Cultured trophozoites of E. histolytica HM-1: IMSS and E. dispar SAW were used as the positive control. Seven human fecal samples, from which E. histolytica-like cysts were detected by microscopic examination, and three intestinal protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium parvum HNJ-1, Giardia intestinalis Portland-1, and Blastocytis hominis Nand II, were used for the evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the PCR method. The other PCR method, which has been used for the diagnosis of amebic infections in Japan, was also performed by using the same samples for the evaluation. In comparison with the conventional PCR method, the multiplex-PCR showed 1) higher sensitivity, 2) the size of diagnostic fragments of PCR products was clearly different in both Entamoeba species, 3) it was possible to perform PCR using a single tube per sample, and then to save the amount of DNA polymerase, 4) no diagnostic amplification products were found in other intestinal protozoan parasites, and 5) E. histolytica specific fragment was amplified in all clinical samples examined. In conclusion, it is considered that the multiplex-PCR method is a useful tool for detection of both Entamoeba species DNA from fecal samples and for the distinction between E. histolytica and E. dispar.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.76.921DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pcr method
12
entamoeba histolytica
8
histolytica entamoeba
8
multiplex-pcr method
8
fecal samples
8
intestinal protozoan
8
protozoan parasites
8
entamoeba species
8
entamoeba
6
histolytica
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!