Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The goal of this pilot study was to compare three tracers for the detection of sentinel nodes in patients with lung cancer. Forty-eight patients with clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. Indocyanine green (n=16) or isosulfan blue (n=18) was injected around the tumor intraoperatively, or technetium tin colloid was injected preoperatively under CT guidance (n=14). Sentinel nodes were detected in 6.3% of patients injected with indocyanine green, 50.0% of patients injected with isosulfan blue, and 64.3% of patients injected with technetium tin colloid. The detection rate achieved with indocyanine green was significantly lower than with the other two tracers. A false-negative sentinel node was seen in 1 patient using isosulfan blue. Both isosulfan blue and technetium tin colloid seem to be suitable for intraoperative sentinel node mapping in patients with lung cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00385-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!