Objective: To assess the training in adult subclavian venous catheterization of an inexperienced operator, with two different procedures: ultrasound guidance vs anatomic landmark technique.
Study Design: Prospective, comparative study.
Patients And Methods: After informed consent, 50 adults were divided in two groups, with an original method of inclusion, designed to assess the training of the operator, which alternated ultrasound guidance (n = 25) and Aubaniac's landmark technique (n = 25).
Results: All the catheterizations have been completed. The success rate at first attempt was higher in ultrasound group than in landmark group, without reaching significance (76 vs 56%). Two arterial punctures were reported in landmark group. With ultrasound guidance, there were 21 puncture sites at the external third and 4 at the medial third of the clavicle. Average access time (skin to vein) was 15 +/- 8 seconds in ultrasound group and 63 +/- 78 seconds in landmark group (p < 0.01), with a significant relation between access time and patient rank in landmark group (r2 = 0.42, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance makes the training in adult subclavian venous catheterization easier, and allows inexperimented operator to be rapidly efficient. The use of ultrasound would decrease the incidence of complications by a real time visualization of anatomical structures, and by a more external approach of the vein than in the Aubaniac's technique.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0750-7658(02)00778-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!