Objective: To investigate the capacity of blood draining from the central nervous system of patients with acute brain injury to induce cell death, and to determine whether this phenomenon could be a way to induce the production of autoantibodies.
Methods: The induction of cell death of several human leukemia cell lines cultured in vitro in the presence of serum collected from the brain or the systemic circulation of patients with acute brain injury was analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with annexin V and propidium iodide. The percentages of apoptotic lymphocytes derived directly from the patients were also quantified. To investigate the mechanisms responsible for the induction of cell death, the expression of apoptosis-related molecules, as well as the effect of addition of several molecules known to interfere with apoptosis, was evaluated in the cell cultures. The presence of serum autoantibodies at the time of injury and 6 months later was studied.
Results: Systemic serum and, especially, serum draining from the brain lesions induced the in vitro death of the leukemia cell lines used. Moreover, there were higher percentages of ex vivo dead lymphocytes in regional blood than in systemic blood 48 hours after injury. These effects seemed to be induced by an exogenous and/or endogenous opioid, since they were blocked by the opioid antagonist, naloxone. Furthermore, such effects were mediated by an increased expression of Bax. Importantly, apoptotic Jurkat cells were bound to autoantibodies, and patients with acute brain injury produced serum autoantibodies some months after the injury. However, they did not develop a full autoimmune disease at that time.
Conclusion: Serum factors from acute brain injuries induce cell death, both in vivo and in vitro. Apoptotic cells and, even more so, necrotic cells in acute brain injury are potential sources for autoantigen presentation that may stimulate autoimmune responses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.10684 | DOI Listing |
JAMA
January 2025
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: There has been a great deal of interest in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their association with one another, yet their interaction and subsequent associations with long-term outcomes remain poorly understood.
Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of mTBI that occurred in the context of psychological trauma (peritraumatic context) with mTBI that did not (nonperitraumatic context).
Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study of post-9/11 US veterans used data from the Translational Research Center for Traumatic Brain Injury and Stress Disorders (TRACTS) study at the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, which began in 2009; the current study utilized data from baseline TRACTS visits conducted between 2009 and 2024.
JAMA
January 2025
Yale University School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Acta Neuropathol
January 2025
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund Brain Injury Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Lund University, 222 20, Lund, Sweden.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often leads to impaired regulation of cerebral blood flow, which may be caused by pathological changes of the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in the arterial wall. Moreover, these cerebrovascular changes may contribute to the development of various neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's-like pathologies that include amyloid beta aggregation. Despite its importance, the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for VSMC dysfunction after TBI have rarely been evaluated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEpilepsia
January 2025
Epilepsy Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Acute symptomatic seizures, occurring shortly after a central nervous system insult, constitute nearly half of all seizure cases. However, there is a conspicuous absence of clear, comprehensive, and cohesive guidelines for the management of these seizures with antiseizure medications, especially their duration of use. This lack of consensus on the optimal duration of therapy leads to prolonged treatments that may carry adverse consequences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!