Influence of stereotyping in smoking cessation counseling by primary care residents.

Ethn Dis

Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention, Detection and Control Research Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710-2949, USA.

Published: March 2003

This study examined racial differences in primary care residents' rates of addressing smoking cessation. We expected residents to have higher rates of addressing cessation with White female patients as compared with African-American or Hispanic female patients, due, in part, to residents having higher outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, lower barriers, and less reliance on stereotypes. Residents (N = 90) were an average of 31 years old; two-thirds were White internal medicine residents. Residents viewed a video of a lower-middle class White, African-American, or Hispanic female interacting with her physician about stomach pain. Results indicate that residents were very likely to address smoking cessation, regardless of patients' race. Compared to residents assigned to an ethnic minority patient, residents assigned to the White patient were less likely to believe the patient would follow their advice (P < .03) and also perceived more barriers to address smoking cessation (P < .04). Reliance on the stereotype of Whites mediated the racial difference in outcome expectancies. Implications are that residents may be relying on stereotypes when they assess lower-middle class White female patients' receptivity to smoking cessation advice. Future research on the role of stereotyping in medical settings is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smoking cessation
20
residents
10
primary care
8
rates addressing
8
residents higher
8
white female
8
female patients
8
african-american hispanic
8
hispanic female
8
outcome expectancies
8

Similar Publications

Background: Smoking prevalence among U.S. adults experiencing homelessness is ≥70 %.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BackgroundTobacco use is linked to increased cancer risk, and people who smoke represent a large proportion of newly diagnosed patients with cancer. The fact that smoking cessation at the time of diagnosis can improve the patient's life expectancy is still not broadly understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the survival benefits obtainable by quitting smoking on diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trends in smoking-attributable cardiovascular mortality in Germany.

Eur J Public Health

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

We quantified the fraction of cardiovascular deaths attributable to smoking in Germany over time, accounting for population ageing. We calculated population-attributable fractions to quantify cardiovascular deaths attributable to smoking for 1992 to 2021, and compared actual with age-standardized figures. We found a significant decline in the number of cardiovascular deaths attributable to smoking: from about 71 900 cases in 1992 to around 42 000 cases in 2021, with a steeper decline in men.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use of nicotine products, prescription drug products, and other methods to stop smoking by US adults in the 2022 National Health Interview Survey.

Intern Emerg Med

January 2025

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Recent data on methods used by adults to stop smoking can inform tobacco control policies. Nationally representative Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (N = 27,651) were used to analyze populations of US adults who self-reported having stopped smoking cigarettes for 6 months or longer in the last year and the methods they used, or who did not stop smoking but tried in the last year (N = 1735). In 2022, an estimated 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intensive longitudinal data analysis, commonly used in psychological studies, often concerns outcomes that have strong floor effects, that is, a large percentage at its lowest value. Ignoring a strong floor effect, using regular analysis with modeling assumptions suitable for a continuous-normal outcome, is likely to give misleading results. This article suggests that two-part modeling may provide a solution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!