Purpose: To evaluate microleakage at the dentin margins of Class II resin-based composite restorations using four simplified adhesive systems: Etch & Prime 3.0, Prime & Bond NT, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and Clearfil SE Bond, upon thermal and mechanical stresses.

Materials And Methods: Forty slot preparations (5mm x 3mm x 1.5mm) were cut in sound human molars with gingival margins below the cement/enamel junction. All adhesive systems were applied strictly according to manufacturers' instructions. Cavities were restored using Clearfil AP-X composite resin. After finishing and polishing, teeth were submitted to thermal (x700, 5-55 degrees C, 60-second dwell time) and consecutively mechanical cycling (100,000 cycle; 8 Kgf load). Specimens were coated with nail polish, immersed in silver nitrate for 2 hours and sectioned longitudinally with a diamond disc. The extent of leakage was ranked using a 0-4 scale.

Results: Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Minimal leakage occurred with Clearfil SE Bond. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.01) between this system and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, although the latter also showed low values of dye penetration. No statistically significant difference was found between Etch & Prime 3.0 and Prime & Bond NT. Both showed statistically greater leakage than the two other systems (P<0.01).

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adhesive systems
12
simplified adhesive
8
thermal mechanical
8
bond clearfil
8
clearfil bond
8
microleakage simplified
4
systems thermal
4
mechanical stresses
4
stresses purpose
4
purpose evaluate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!