Background: The goal of the present study was to examine participants' perceptions of a theory-driven, physical activity promotion website.
Methods: Participants in the present study were individuals in the website condition of a randomized trial designed to test the efficacy of the website. At 1 month, participants were surveyed regarding their self-report of barriers, frequency of use, and helpfulness of the website.
Results: Overall, 30 worksite participants were randomized to the website condition and 24 (80%) completed the survey at 1 month. The main barrier to using the website was a "lack of time" (63%). No participants endorsed trouble using the website, a lack of interest in using the internet, or a lack of interest in changing their activity level as barriers to using the website. Furthermore, most sections of the website were found to be "helpful." Patterns of use and perceived utility differed by readiness to become active. For example, more respondents in the "preparation" stage at baseline reported using the overall website, in addition to the "becoming active" and "physical activity and health" sections, than those in the "contemplation" stage at baseline. Perceived utility and frequency of use of specific sections were often divergent, where some sections were rated more helpful and used less frequently (the "Overcoming Barriers" section, for example), while the reverse was true for other sections (the "Walking Fitness Test" section, for example).
Conclusion: In conclusion, the website was well accepted and few barriers were noted. Areas of the website that were used less frequently or found to be less helpful will become areas of focus for future iterations of the site.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2002.1103 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
January 2025
Substitutive Dental Sciences Department (Prosthodontics), College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Background: This study aimed to investigate the quality and readability of online English health information about dental sensitivity and how patients evaluate and utilize these web-based information.
Methods: The credibility and readability of health information was obtained from three search engines. We conducted searches in "incognito" mode to reduce the possibility of biases.
PLoS One
January 2025
School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the readability of information on different treatment options for breast cancer from WeChat public accounts, propose targeted improvement strategies based on the evaluation of the results of the various treatment options, and provide a reference for producers of WeChat public accounts from which to write highly readable information regarding breast cancer treatment options.
Methods: With "breast cancer" as keywords in April 2021, searches were implemented on Sogou WeChat website (https://weixin.sogou.
Rheumatol Int
January 2025
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Little is known about how patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) access and trust health information. This research aimed to: describe the sources of information most frequently accessed/trusted by patients with APS/aPL; identify if individuals with APS/aPL perceived their health had been negatively impacted by various sources and document obstacles to accessing health information. Patients meeting Revised Sapporo Criteria for APS or with ≥1 positive aPL on ≥2 occasions were recruited to an online survey regarding their health information use at diagnosis and within 6 months preceding survey completion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Legal Med
January 2025
Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, 100038, China.
China's forensic pathology standardization has accumulated more than 30 years of experience, but there is limited research summarizing the features and detailed information concerning these standards. In this paper, we collected documents on forensic pathology standards and statistically analyzed their types, effective scopes, drafting units, authorization departments, promulgation times, revision cycles, and other information. All of the standards information was obtained from standardization websites and databases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!