AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (acustimulation) using the ReliefBand to ondansetron in treating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients after laparoscopic surgery.
  • A total of 268 outpatients were involved, and 90 developed PONV, which were then treated with either ondansetron, acustimulation, or a combination of both, with follow-up on recovery times and patient outcomes.
  • Results showed that the combination group had a better success rate in preventing nausea than the acustimulation group, but there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction or overall recovery scores among the groups.

Article Abstract

Background: This study was designed to evaluate transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (acustimulation) using the ReliefBand compared with ondansetron for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after outpatient laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: After the authors obtained institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 268 outpatients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled study. All patients received antiemetic prophylaxis with metoclopramide, 10 mg intravenously, or droperidol, 0.625 mg intravenously, after induction of anesthesia. A total of 90 patients developed PONV in the recovery units and were randomized to one of three treatment groups: (1) the ondansetron group received 4 mg intravenous ondansetron and a sham ReliefBand; (2) the acustimulation group received 2 ml intravenous saline and a ReliefBand; and (3) the combination group received 4 mg intravenous ondansetron and a ReliefBand. A rescue antiemetic (10 mg intravenous metoclopramide) was administered only if the PONV symptoms persisted for 15 min or longer after initiating the treatment. A blinded observer recorded the recovery times, emetic symptoms, rescue antiemetics, maximum nausea scores, complete response to study treatment, and time to achieve discharge criteria. Postdischarge side effects, as well as patient satisfaction and quality of recovery scores, were assessed at 24 and 72 h after surgery.

Results: The combination group had a significantly higher complete response rate than the acustimulation group (73% vs.40%, P <0.01). In addition, fewer patients (8 vs. 18) in the combination (vs. acustimulation) group experienced subsequent emetic events (P < 0.03). However, there were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to patient satisfaction and quality of recovery scores.

Conclusions: Acustimulation with the ReliefBand can be used as an alternative to ondansetron for the treatment of established PONV. However, the use of ondansetron (4 mg intravenously) in combination with the ReliefBand device improved the complete response rate to the acustimulation therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200212000-00009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group received
12
received intravenous
12
ondansetron treatment
8
treatment established
8
established postoperative
8
postoperative nausea
8
nausea vomiting
8
intravenous ondansetron
8
acustimulation group
8
combination group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!