Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A study was performed to compare the mechanical properties of two intracarpal ligaments with those of the dorsal component of the scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL). Trapezoid-to-second metacarpal, capitate-to-trapezoid ligaments, and the dorsal part of the SLIL were obtained as bone-ligament-bone grafts from fresh frozen cadavers. Their respective load to failure and stiffness were measured under uniaxial load on a servohydraulic machine and compared. The capitate-to-trapezoid ligament closely approximated the load to failure and stiffness of the dorsal SLIL, whereas the trapezoid-to-second metacarpal ligament was significantly stronger and stiffer than the dorsal SLIL. These 2 intracarpal bone-ligament-bone grafts share similar mechanical properties with the dorsal component of the scapholunate ligament and might be used clinically to replace it.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.36514 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!